duwoku.cc 
19Ibid.
20Volkan lists many such examples. The Czechs hold onto the memory of Bila Hora, the Lakota retain image of Wounded Knee, and Crimean Tartars define themselves by the shared experience of being deported from the Crimea. See Volkan, Bloodlines, p. 49.
21電影《暹羅玫瑰》（Siamese Renaissance）大剔上雨據的就是泰國小說《情牽兩世》（Thawiphob）。
22Rachel Harrison, “Mind the Gap: (En)countering the West and the Making of Thai Identities on Film,” in Harrison and Jackson (eds.), Ambiguous Allure of the West, p. 114.
23There are several accounts of this incident. See Lawrence Palmer Briggs, “The Aubaret versus Bradley Case at Bangkok, 1866–1867,” Far Eastern Quarterly 6:3 (1947), pp. 262–282.
24Baker and Pasuk, A History of Thailand, pp. 76–77.
25Harrison and Jackson, Ambiguous Allure of the West, pp. 52–53.
26Ibid., p. 12.
27Benedict Anderson, “The State of Thai Studies: Studies of the Thai State,” in Eliezer B. Ayal (ed.), The Study of Thailand: Analyses of Knowledge, Approaches, and Prospects in Anthropology, Art History, Economics, History, and Political Science, Southeast Asia series, no. 54 (Athens: Ohio University Center for International Studies, 1978), p. 197.
28Harrison and Jackson, Ambiguous Allure of the West, p. 12.
29See Kasian Tejapira, Commodifying Marxism: The Formation of Modern Thai Radical Culture, 1927–1958 (Kyoto: Kyoto Areas Studies on Asia No. 3, 2001); Thongchai Winichakul. “The Quest for ‘Siwilai’: A Geographical Discourse of Civilizational Thinking in the Late Nineteenth and Early Twentieth-Century Siam.” Journal of Asian Studies 59:3 (2002); Maurizio Peleggi, Lords of Things: The Fashioning of the Siamese Monarchy’s Modern Image (Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press, 2002).
30Peleggi, Lords of Things, p. 6.
31Harrison and Jackson, Ambiguous Allure of the West.
32Wan khru, January 19, 1938.
33騰蘇．努農的說法，是泰國學者以「竹子外寒」解釋泰國外寒政策的又一例證。但如果要相信泰國經歷多場衝突戰淬始終保持獨立，我們就得忽略許多史實，包括泄本在1941年入侵、披汶對盟國宣戰、數以千計泄軍在二戰期間看駐泰國，以及戰欢英國殖民軍看駐等等。
34Callahan, “Beyond Cosmopolitanism and Nationalism,” p. 497.
第一章架構損失：廢除暹羅的不平等條約
01Luang Nathabanja, Extra-territoriality in Siam (Bangkok: Bangkok Daily Mail, 1924), p. 5.
02M. B. Hooker, Laws of Southeast Asia, vol. 2: European Laws in Southeast Asia (Singapore: Butterworth and Company, 1988), p. 535.
03David Wyatt, Thailand: A Short History (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2003), p. 168.
04Lysa Hong, “ ‘Stranger within the Gates’: Knowing Semi-Colonial Siam as Extraterritorials,” Modern Asian Studies 38:2 (2004), p. 350.
05Luang Nathabanja, Extra-territoriality in Siam, pp. 2–3.
06Ibid., p. 5.
07Ibid., p. 6.
08Ibid., p. 25.
09Ibid., p. 38.
10Kullada Kesboonchoo Mead, The Rise and Decline of Thai Absolutism (London: Routledge, 2009), pp. 1–3.
11B. J. Terwiel, “The Bowring Treaty: Imperialism and the Indigenous Perspective,” Journal of Siam Society 79:2 (1991), p. 43.
12Ibid., p. 27.
13Ibid., pp. 27–28.
14Ibid., p. 30.
15Ibid., pp. 30–31.
16Ibid., p. 31 (italics mine).
17Luang Nathabanja, Extra-territoriality in Siam, p. 25.
18Constance Wilson, “State and Society in the Reign of Mongkut, 1851–1868: Thailand on the Eve of Modernization” (Ph.D. diss., Cornell University, 1970), p. 363.
19Thongchai Winichakul, Siam Mapped: A History of the Geo-Body of a Nation (Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press, 1994), p. 88.
20Wilson, “State and Society,” pp. 538–541.
21Mathew Copeland, “Contested Nationalism and the 1932 Overthrow of the Absolute Monarchy in Siam” (Ph.D. diss., Australian National University, 1993), p. 14.
22Ibid.
23Patrick Tuck, The French Wolf and the Siamese Lamb: The French Threat to Siamese Independence, 1858–1907 (Bangkok: White Lotus Press, 1995), p. 126.
24Ibid., pp. 294–296.
25Ibid., p. 179.
26Ibid., p. 180.
27Ibid.
28Ibid.
29Wyatt, Thailand, p. 191.
30Ibid., p. 192.
31直到1919年，美國沒有與暹羅簽過任何可以與1907年暹羅與法國，以及1909年暹羅與英國相比的條約，所以與美國簽訂新約是暹羅的政策優先。See Peter B. Oblas, “A Very Small Part of World Affairs: Siam’s Policy on Treaty Revision and the Paris Peace Conference,” Journal of Siam Society 59:2 (1971), p. 58.
32Ibid., p. 62.
33暹羅所以想宣戰，並不完全為了修改不平等條約，它同時也反映拉瑪六世提升國家地位的戰略。See Walter F. Vella, Chaiyo! King Vajiravudh and the Development of Thai Nationalism (Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press, 1978), pp. 109–110.
